Bumble Boost Websites
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Single Bodybuiders And Athletic Dating
A site to meet and date single bodybuilders and other athletic dates including all types of muscular women.
Not Applicable
$
8.94
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
Home | King et al. v. Bumble Trading, Inc. et al.
The case alleges that Bumble’s Terms & Conditions fail to notify subscribers of their legal right to cancel their Boost subscription and obtain a refund within three business days in violation of certain consumer protection laws that may apply to all of Bumble’s Boost users nationwide. The case also alleges that for ce
Not Applicable
$
8.95
